PartialLogo
Britain
premium

BHA and Dunshea challenged to present evidence for comments about jockey actions

Lord Windermere and Davy Russell (left) win the Gold Cup from On His Own and The Giant Bolster following an inquiry into interference
Rory Mac Neice does not believe riders are pushing the boundaries over interferenceCredit: John Grossick

The BHA and its chief regulatory officer Brant Dunshea have been challenged to present the evidence for their comments that jockey behaviour could be changed by the success rate of appeals against raceday riding suspensions.

Writing in Friday’s Racing Post, Dunshea expressed concerns that jockeys were overturning bans before the independent disciplinary panel "the majority of the time” and that this could impact both how jockeys approached riding and how stewards were able to officiate.

He said: "The ability to appeal against racecourse decisions is an essential part of a regulatory system, and this proves that the disciplinary panels are truly independent, but at the same time it can be challenging for our stewarding teams when the suspensions that they impose are frequently overturned on appeal. It is possible that this, in turn, could have a knock-on effect on rider behaviour."

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Deputy industry editor

Published on inBritain

Last updated

iconCopy