PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Seismic fracture over National Hunt Chase just serves to pour fuel on the fire

Le Breuil and Jamie Codd (right) win the National Hunt Chase, which has reignited the flames about equine welfare
Le Breuil and Jamie Codd (right) win the National Hunt Chase, which has reignited the flames about equine welfareCredit: Edward Whitaker

Conflict of interest; a phrase that has never gained purchase within racing was raised repeatedly by several MPs in last year’s House of Commons debate on whether the BHA should be responsible for horse welfare, or whether an 'independent' body should divest the BHA of that function.

Views expressed in that debate are what prompted the BHA to raise the welfare stakes, which provoked uproar when the Cheltenham stewards issued suspensions totalling 37 days to three jockeys after last week’s National Hunt Chase.

Some MPs argued that an authority whose remit is to grow and promote the sport was at odds with safeguarding equine welfare. It amounted to a conflict of interest. Others disagreed, maintaining a sound welfare policy was central to racing retaining its popularity.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Julian MuscatFeatures writer

Published on 19 March 2019inComment

Last updated 15:49, 20 March 2019

iconCopy