PartialLogo
Britain
premium

A retrograde step in the march for equality

Katherine Fidler on a decision that is more of an insult than a benefit to female jockeys

The 2015 Shergar Cup winners overcame the disadvantage of hideous pink silks
The 2015 Shergar Cup winners overcame the disadvantage of hideous pink silksCredit: Mark Cranham

The crux of this argument comes down to the fact France Galop believes female jockeys are at a disadvantage compared to their male counterparts through lack of a Y chromosome.

It may try to sugarcoat that stance with statements that an allowance encouraging owners and trainers to use more female jockeys, passing the buck somewhat and blaming regular old chauvinism, but France Galop president Edouard de Rothschild's belief that there needs to be "compensation for the difference in physical strength" between male and female riders ensures there's no grey area (just pink and blue, apparently).

It is 2017, and that is an attitude many – likely most – will feel is both a retrograde step on the march to equality and downright insulting, especially when brought into effect by a body mostly governed by men. As we have seen in the wider world, decisions made for women by men are simply no longer acceptable to many.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

inBritain

iconCopy