PartialLogo
Comment
premium

A punter's worst enemy can be in their own head, even when things are going well

Champ falls two out in the Dipper Novices' Chase at Cheltenham on New Year's Day
Champ: stung favourite-backers when falling on New Year's Day at CheltenhamCredit: Edward Whitaker

When we ask the gods to grant us the skills to be better punters, the desired attributes are judgement and discipline, the pair clear. Another aspect which is given some attention but not, in my view, as much as it deserves, is psychology.

The psychology of betting is not just about having enough ice in the blood. More important is the ability to avoid the pitfalls your mind puts in front of you. The most common would be selection biases, confirmation biases and subtle manifestations of the gambler's fallacy.

There is also an adjunct to the Dunning-Kruger effect, which it is believed turns up a lot in betting. The Dunning-Kruger effect describes what happens when a group takes part in a simple quiz. The less able write in all the answers and presume they have aced it. When asked to guess how they fared, they overestimated their performance. More able types, recognising the ease of the test, underestimate their relative performance, making the assumption that everyone did well.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Betting editor

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy