The whip's a big perception issue and we've acted in the sport's best interests

Comment by David Jones, the regulatory independent non-executive director for the BHA, and chair of the Whip Consultation Steering Group

Given that use of the whip has often been a flashpoint for heated debate, it was inevitable that the adjustments to the rules we announced this week would provoke a strong reaction. And it was, sadly, predictable that they would be presented by some as a u-turn, in particular the removal of the backhand-only rule.

However, the fact is the BHA board, throughout an extensive period of analysis, discussions and then, yes, negotiations, took all its decisions with one clear view in mind: to do nothing that diluted the principles defined by the steering group.

It did so in the interests of our sport. Not for vested interests or lobby groups or recalcitrants but for the sport.

When the steering group concluded its thorough process, we all agreed on a set of objectives for revisions to the whip rules. These included changes to ensure a more considered and judicious use of the whip.

Those who describe this as appeasing those who are opposed to our sport in principle are missing the point: in the modern age, and with the leisure industry more furiously competitive than ever, perception is crucial.

Jockeys will still be able to use the whip in the forehand position following amendmentsCredit: Alan Crowhurst (Getty Images)

This is not about persuading people who will never agree with our sport. It is instead about reaching those people who could potentially be fans of our sport now or in the future but who are put off by the sight of the whip being used in its current form.

Use of the whip in its current form is a major perception issue. There is plenty of research to show it is potentially the greatest barrier to engagement with racing. And these views are hardening among the public.

At the same time, the steering group was clear in its view that the whip is an essential aid to horsemanship, and that its use for encouragement has a place in racing, as long as the correct controls regarding horse welfare are in place.

It is therefore about finding the right balance between respecting the importance of our customers' views and retaining the core principles of good, safe race-riding. This package of measures delivers that.

The BHA board is clear that the new adjustments, when combined with the full package of measures, deliver the same objectives, just in a different way.

The reductions in thresholds, removal of 'discretion' in stewarding, significantly increased penalties, the deterrent of disqualification and introduction of the whip review committee will all, when combined, achieve the objectives of improving whip use.

Presenting this as a "win" for jockeys undermines the incredibly hard work put in by people across the sport – including jockeys – to bring about positive change.

By taking proactive steps to address the issue of the whip, British racing has put its destiny in its own hands. The suggestion that external forces are not interested in the whip is simply not correct. The Labour Party's last general election manifesto included a pledge for an independent review of the use of the whip for encouragement.

Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party called for an independent review of the whip in its manifesto at the last general electionCredit: Paul Gilham

This is an issue for all of us and I am encouraged to see jockeys' comments that they take responsibility for whip use. Their message has been clear – the new rules are black and white, the penalties are hard but fair and necessary, and the responsibility for riding within the rules now rests with them. I hope and expect to see the new rules and penalties respected.

It has been suggested that the backhand-only rule was obviously flawed and drawn up by suits in High Holborn. This is not true. The suggestion of the backhand-only rule was originally brought for discussion to the steering group by members who work as participants in the sport.

It is worth remembering the steering group which made the initial recommendations was made up of representatives from across the industry. It included top trainers, jockeys, owners, breeders, racecourse executives, stable staff, racing media and individuals with an intimate knowledge of betting. It also included perspectives from parliamentarians, vets and recognised animal welfare charities. No better or more appropriate group of people could have been assembled to make these proposals.

The steering group's initial proposals included a reduction in thresholds for use, but at the last minute a request was made to consider a different approach based on a backhand-only rule. When this was announced last July, it was generally well received. While some individuals lodged concerns, the overwhelming response was acceptance.

There followed further, extensive technical discussions during which there was no shortage of time for jockeys or their representative body to raise concerns, but an extraordinarily challenging situation was created when, within days of the new rules being implemented, a swift and strong groundswell of opinion suddenly emerged from jockeys. New information was presented that some riders, for a range of reasons, were having difficulty in adjusting to a technique applying the backhand grip only.

The BHA board could have dug its heels in and said it was too late. That would have been irresponsible. Instead the board listened to the overtures from jockeys and swiftly and decisively adjusted the proposals while keeping those core guiding principles in mind.

However, we cannot allow this type of scenario to unfold again. This was a view made clear by the BHA board and one accepted by the Professional Jockeys Association. I am pleased to see that the PJA has publicly committed to review its consultation processes.

Any sport, especially one with the heritage and tradition of British racing, will always find change difficult. We understand this, and it was never going to be easy. This, however, should not make us afraid to bring about change for the good of the sport.

Read more here:

'We want to get it right' - Skelton says jockeys are keen for new rules to work (£)

'At least they've listened' - BHA amends whip proposal after jockey criticism

I'm sick to death of the sodding whip - why couldn't we just leave it alone? (£)

The Front Runner is our latest email newsletter available exclusively to Members' Club Ultimate subscribers. Chris Cook, a four-time Racing Reporter of the Year award winner, provides his take on the day's biggest stories and tips for the upcoming racing every morning from Monday to Friday. Not a Members' Club Ultimate subscriber? Click here to join today and also receive our Ultimate Daily emails plus our full range of fantastic website and newspaper content