PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Racing exposé is a tough but necessary watch and now intensifies welfare debate

Australian racing has been rocked by the television investigation into the fate of some horses in retirement
Australian racing has been rocked by the television investigation into the fate of some horses in retirementCredit: Vince Caligiuri

The subject matter of last week's main column piece, forecasting a possible equine welfare furore in Australia, proved unintentionally prescient, although not for the anticipated reason.

It was reported on this page that Paul Preusker, trainer of leading Melbourne Cup contender Surprise Baby, had served a four-year ban from the sport after being found guilty of using a jigger, a device used to inflict an electric shock upon horses during training.

Prior to that column piece appearing, those linked to Australian racing and its media coverage had made no recent references to Preusker's past, choosing instead to portray him as a small-time trainer attempting to beat global heavyweights in the nation's premier race.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Lee MottersheadSenior writer

Published on 20 October 2019inComment

Last updated 17:37, 20 October 2019

iconCopy