Jockeys deserve our sympathy and support - but saunas cannot be the answer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30e63/30e63131ae3a36425fa933fcf88625684ac8c7d5" alt="SUNBURY, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 25: A general view at Kempton Park on February 25, 2023 in Sunbury, England. (Photo by Alan Crowhurst/Getty Images)"
At the heart of the saunas debate, once you peel away the sensationalism, red herrings and anger, is a story of jockeys who are suffering. Presented with their testimonies, it is impossible not to feel sympathy. That does not mean returning saunas to racecourses would be the right thing to do.
This column could head down many different alleyways. It might argue the current landscape is broadly similar to the one that existed during Covid, when jockeys received a 3lb pandemic allowance on top of the longstanding 3lb safety allowance. That safety allowance has now been increased to 4lb and almost all race weights have risen by 2lb. In theory, therefore, a jockey whose minimum weight was previously 8st 10lb ought now to be working up from 8st 12lb.
That's the theory. Sometimes theory and practice do not work in tandem. In theory, the sport believed the Professional Jockeys Association was supportive of the sauna ban, primarily because that was its stated position. Now that position has changed. What has not changed are the reasons why a reintroduction of saunas would be hard to achieve.
Read the full story
Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.
Subscribe to unlock
- Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
- Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
- Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
- Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
- Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
- Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Already a subscriber?Log in
Published on inLee Mottershead
Last updated
- 'I believe in the freedom of choice' - Cartmel's vicar brings good sense to the gambling debate
- Uncertainty around Ballyburn and handicap entries show why Cheltenham Festival changes were needed
- 'I've not felt so much goodwill from the public since the days of Kauto' - Paul Nicholls opens up after a win which really mattered
- Ignorant, insulting and condescending: MPs painting gambling as a public health issue have got it horribly wrong
- A baffling act of self-harm - trainers boycotting television interviews would damage them and the sport
- 'I believe in the freedom of choice' - Cartmel's vicar brings good sense to the gambling debate
- Uncertainty around Ballyburn and handicap entries show why Cheltenham Festival changes were needed
- 'I've not felt so much goodwill from the public since the days of Kauto' - Paul Nicholls opens up after a win which really mattered
- Ignorant, insulting and condescending: MPs painting gambling as a public health issue have got it horribly wrong
- A baffling act of self-harm - trainers boycotting television interviews would damage them and the sport