PartialLogo
Comment
premium

How poor old Thirsk became a victim of the law of unintended consequences

Thirsk racecourse: scene of Alfie's Angel's win for Karen Tutty
Thirsk: most profitable meeting has been rescheduledCredit: Edward Whitaker

Beware the law of unintended consequences, a phenomenon that has brought gloom to a handful of racecourses this summer.

Changes brought in with the best of intentions can cause unexpected problems as they take effect. Ask the people of Scunthorpe, whose online access is disrupted when a well-meaning Google or AOL attempts to clean up the internet with a profanity filter that blocks certain four-letter words. Or the British rulers who tried to rid colonial Delhi of lethal cobras by offering a reward for each dead snake, leading enterprising locals to breed them to collect the bounty and make the problem worse than ever.

There are no venomous snakes slithering around Thirsk, but there may be the odd poisonous glance in the direction of racing's decision-makers.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Reporter

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy