PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Hancock's stance should make racing pause for reflection over dash for cash

Matt Hancock made clear he does not believe racing should profit from FOBT money
Matt Hancock made clear he does not believe racing should profit from FOBT moneyCredit: Chris Bourchier

If bookmakers had been betting on the government's final verdict on fixed odds betting terminals a new £2 maximum stake would, over time, have been slashed to red-hot favouritism.

This column made clear its position on the machines last week. In short, although it is to be deeply regretted that jobs will be lost as a result of £100 becoming £2, the government surely took the correct course of action, even if one might have expected and wanted a much more detailed timetable for implementation than was outlined.

Some might claim Theresa May's administration has exploited the FOBT debate to occupy what, for this or any government, is a rare luxury, namely a moral high ground. Others will argue, and almost certainly rightly so, that the moral case for £2 was so strong it simply had to be implemented.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Lee MottersheadSenior writer

Published on 20 May 2018inComment

Last updated 14:42, 20 May 2018

iconCopy