PartialLogo
Features
premium

PJA: welfare risk is 'the reddest of red herrings'

Bill Barber examines the BHA's new measures

There must be some regard for the racing public and punter, says Ben Woollcott
High numbers of non-runners are regarded as damaging to British racingCredit: Patrick McCann (racingpost.com/photos)

Non-runners have long been a contentious subject in British racing, and particularly so since the advent of 48-hour declarations.

The issue rose to the surface again in August when the BHA announced a wide-ranging series of recommendations to reduce their numbers.

One of their more controversial measures was that trainers who breached a threshold of 50 per cent more than the average rate for non-runners would have the right to self-certify withdrawn for 12 months – and last week the BHA unveiled league tables naming and shaming those who might fall foul of the new rules.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Industry editor

Published on inFeatures

Last updated

iconCopy