PartialLogo
News
premium

The rights, wrongs and consequences of the landmark Morrison ruling

Imogen Pickard: subject of unfounded insinuations about her involvement
Imogen Pickard: subject of unfounded insinuations about her involvementCredit: John Grossick (racingpost.com/photos)

Unpicking the consequences of the verdict in the Our Little Sister case will take months, but a few things are immediately clear following Friday's disciplinary panel verdict which in effect exonerates Hughie Morrison.

First and foremost, the panel's conclusion that it was unlikely that Morrison or anyone under his control injected Our Little Sister with an anabolic steroid was fair and sound. Morrison had no motive to dope such a low-grade filly, there was no evidence she had ever been doped before and she was sent racing repeatedly during the period when nandrolone was in her system.

Furthermore, Morrison invested considerable time and money in proving his innocence, paying for a hair sample, engaging scientists and a private investigator, and offering a £10,000 reward for information about who had actually pressed the plunger. The panel rightly concluded these were not the actions of a guilty man.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on 22 December 2017inNews

Last updated 18:30, 22 December 2017

iconCopy