OpinionBill Barber
premium

Father Ted moment for MPs as anti-gambling groups trot out old bugbear again

author image
Industry editor
Lawrence Robertson MP co-chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Racing & Bloodstock
MPs have conflicting evidence to sift through after launching an inquiry into gambling regulationCredit: Mike Hewitt

In the absence of any white smoke from the British government about its gambling review, those on all sides of the debate have had the chance to make their arguments all over again in a separate inquiry into gambling regulation, submissions for which were published last week.

There will have been some who would not necessarily have welcomed the opportunity given everything else that is going on in the sphere of regulation, and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport select committee which announced the call for evidence in December may have slight regrets too, given the opposing and often contradictory evidence that it will have to navigate its way through.

The inquiry was launched to investigate the progress made by the government in addressing the issues raised in parliament about gambling, how to ensure regulation keeps up with innovations in online gambling, and the links between gambling, broadcasting and sport.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inBill Barber

Last updated

iconCopy