OpinionTom Segal
premium

You're allowed to find a winner without pretending to have split the atom - here's what you should focus on

author image
Tipster
Runners in the 7½f handicap, won by Two Tempting leave the stalls with the packed Chester stands in the background
It can often pay to keep things simple when it comes to finding winnersCredit: Edward Whitaker (racingpost.com/photos)

There aren't many things I'm very good at. I could bat a bit at cricket and my golf was okay before my back went, but if I was to say the one thing I was best at it would be exams.

Anyone who knows me would agree it was nothing to do with the amount of study I did, quite the opposite, and the simple reason is that I've always been good at answering the question posed. 

For example, if there was a question about the economic reasons for the rise of Hitler, most of my peers would write everything they knew about the rise of Hitler, seemingly completely forgetting the word 'economic'. 

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inTom Segal

Last updated

iconCopy