OpinionDenis Harney
premium

The rule designed to protect punters that is actually hurting them

Reporter
The stewards made the right decision on the day at Naas
The stewards made the right decision on the day at NaasCredit: Patrick McCann (racingpost.com/photos)

IIt’s not often you are left with such mixed feelings about a stewarding decision, but so it was when stewards at Naas last weekend refused attempts by the Ballydoyle team to change jockeys after original reserve Saratoga gained a place in the big-field Beggar's End Handicap.

Wayne Lordan had been declared to ride Light As Air in the race but, with Saratoga sneaking in, Pat Keating, on behalf of Aidan O’Brien, sought to switch Lordan to him. The stewards refused, enforcing the rule that a jockey can’t change mounts to a reserve unless their original ride is a non-runner.

It was heartening to see the stewards stand firm in the face of considerable pressure and apply the rule correctly. But it begged a big question over the rule itself: is it actually serving anybody?

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inDenis Harney

Last updated

iconCopy