PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Look at the bigger picture and it's hard to say the BHA's flu response was wrong

The BHA action meant hundreds of racehorses had to be swabbed. Their actions, however, were eminently the most sensible option
The BHA action meant hundreds of racehorses had to be swabbed. Their actions, however, were eminently the most sensible optionCredit: Edward Whitaker

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

With the blessing of foresight in reverse the course of world history would look very different. At the very least many of us would surely have long since stopped placing win bets on Singlefarmpayment.

When the BHA put British racing on hold, first for 24 hours and then a total of six days, it did not have the benefit of hindsight. The governing body and regulator knew only what equine influenza could do to an industry for which it has ultimate responsibility. It was aware of the possible worst-case scenario. That such a scenario did not materialise does not mean the decisions taken by the BHA were wrong. Far from it.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

author image
Senior writer

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy