OpinionLee Mottershead
premium

'Inducements to take poison' - why Aussie punters want to bash our bookies

author image
Senior writer
So You See wins on Saturday at Flemington, where racecourse bookmakers were required to lay punters to lose $3,000 due to the minimum bet rule.
So You See wins on Saturday at Flemington, where racecourse bookmakers were required to lay punters to lose $3,000 due to the minimum bet rule.Credit: Brett Holburt

It is just possible I may have sold you a dummy.

The apology in this column is delivered from afar. These words are being penned in Melbourne, where the 39th Asian Racing Conference welcomed 50 speakers, one of whom, Hong Kong Jockey Club integrity expert Tom Chignell, told an audience of global racing leaders that the explosion of affordability checks in Britain represents a valuable open goal for illegal bookmakers.

It was strong stuff, yet Chignell also pointed out that punters can be tempted away from regulated operators and into the arms of the black market when bookmakers limit their ability to bet due to past successes. 

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inLee Mottershead

Last updated

iconCopy