PartialLogo
Comment
premium

Fines and punishments simply do not make sense by comparison

Richard Fahey: his fine for parading two horses in the wrong order is disproportionate to the fines for not applying cheekpieces
Richard Fahey: his fine for parading two horses in the wrong order was disproportionate to the fines for not applying cheekpieces, says Bill JollyCredit: Edward Whitaker

Is it not time the BHA looked again at its fines and punishment policy?

At Goodwood Richard Fahey was fined £1,000 for not parading his runners in the correct order for the Sussex Stakes, which affected nobody, but then for two days running horses were withdrawn because they got to the start without cheekpieces and the trainers were fined £140.

In the first instance the withdrawal of Vercingetorix at Beverley meant the race was reduced to seven runners, so each-way punters lost out, and if you took an early price about the first two you suffered a deduction.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inComment

Last updated

iconCopy