Feature
premium

There's been lots of noise - but just how did the Cheltenham Festival fare on its key objectives?

Scott Burton crunches the numbers following the Prestbury Park extravaganza

author image
France correspondent
Cheltenham: crowds were down compared to last year
Runners in the County Hurdle pass the stands at Cheltenham last weekCredit: Edward Whitaker (racingpost.com/photos)

There has been much debate about whether the Cheltenham Festival began to turn a corner last week following criticism of a 2024 meeting which suffered depressed crowds and too many uncompetitive races. Changes were made to the programme and there has been a renewed focus on providing a better customer experience. 

While so much of the success or otherwise of an event is bound up in storylines, drama and emotion, there are some key metrics by which the Jockey Club's efforts can be judged.


Field sizes

Changing two of the Graded chases to handicaps – the Princess Royal National Hunt Chase and the Golden Miller Chase – was designed in part to limit the number of options among the leading novices from four to two, yet the remaining Grade 1s, the Arkle and the Brown Advisory, drew a combined 12 starters between them, so the effect is yet to be fully felt.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inData Points

Last updated

iconCopy