PartialLogo
Features
premium

Missing Luck but Chamberlin and Fitzgerald are solid

Commercial director David Lace gives his thoughts on racing's TV coverage

Nick Luck: missed from the terrestrial TV line-up
Nick Luck: missed from the terrestrial TV line-upCredit: Edward Whitaker

The coverage on the whole is good, better than I thought it would be. I think the decision to distance themselves from Channel 4 was understandable, but Simon Holt is still the best commentator, why lose that? I was surprised there was no place for Nick Luck, although Ed Chamberlin has proved an excellent anchor man.

There are still improvements to be made around how much time is spent looking at the horses pre-race, but Cheltenham was better. The in-running expert comments are usually good, although sometimes so late in the race they spoil the crescendo you want the race to build to.

Mick Fitzgerald is excellent, as always, Luke Harvey better than I thought, and Matt Chapman does what he does – he will always be a Marmite character. I don’t see the point of Brian Gleeson being there.

Read the full story

Read award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing, with exclusive news, interviews, columns, investigations, stable tours and subscriber-only emails.

Subscribe to unlock
  • Racing Post digital newspaper (worth over £100 per month)
  • Award-winning journalism from the best writers in racing
  • Expert tips from the likes of Tom Segal and Paul Kealy
  • Replays and results analysis from all UK and Irish racecourses
  • Form study tools including the Pro Card and Horse Tracker
  • Extensive archive of statistics covering horses, trainers, jockeys, owners, pedigree and sales data
Subscribe

Already a subscriber?Log in

Published on inFeatures

Last updated

iconCopy